INTRODUCTION
Background to the study
The lack of discipline among students is one of the greatest
problems faced by secondary schools today. Oladela (1989) equally
observed that one of the major problems in the school system is that of
controlling the unwanted behaviour of students which in most cases is
not consistent with the school rules and regulations. General
observation of secondary schools today show that most students lack
discipline.
The term discipline means “training to act in accordance with rules
or behaviour in accord with rules of conduct” (Ani 2002). Ani sees
discipline as readiness or ability to respect authority and observe
conventional or established laws of the society or any organization. It
can therefore be said that discipline implies not only the ability of one to
exercise self control but also the ability to respect constituted authority
obey the rules and regulations of the society and conform with the norms
of any organization.
Ndu (1997) distinguish between self-imposed discipline and
discipline imposed by others.
Nduka and Eneasato (1998) opined that indiscipline is a behaviour that
totally neglects and ignores constituted authority leading to a situation
where established rules regulations norms laid down procedures and
patterns of normal behaviour are not observed in the day-to-day
activities of the individual or group. Okeke (1997) observed that the
misbehaviour of students range from casual to criminal. Such
misbehaviours or offences committed by students include: truancy
cheating in examination bullying drug and sex abuse rebellion rioting
destruction of school property stealing raping cultism lateness
loitering smoking absenteeism and even killing. Achilefu (1989) stated
that disruptive behaviour which is indiscipline is a legal concept
generally applied to children who exhibit behaviours that are punishable
by law. Indeed this act of indiscipline is affecting both schools and
society.
Obi (2004) described the features of the students of today saying
that the students of today are more conscious of their rights and freedom
are more sophisticated with their own ideas beliefs and values and want
to lead the society in which they live hence indiscipline flagrant
disobedience and disrespect for constituted authority organized violence
and demonstration mean nothing to them.
What bothers most well-meaning persons particularly in Enugu
Education Zone is that the ‘deluge’ that is threatening and almost
engulfing the entire structure of the society if left uncontrolled will affect
the society and the future of the children. Camwest (1990) asserted that
lack of discipline among students is one of the greatest problems faced
by schools today.
In summary indiscipline occurs and results when one refuses to
accept a systematic training through education which leads to a
disciplined mode of life that is in harmony with the rules of society. In
spite of the disciplinary measures employed by the principal students
still go out of order and thereby perform badly in their school work. The
disciplinary measures employed by principals are no longer suitable for
this jet age.
Ocho (1997) Opined that schools must have discipline in order to
achieve the aims of Nigerian education since there is no freedom
without discipline. Obi (2004) agreed with Ocho stressing that discipline
is one of the most crucial elements in the ethos of the school. Without
discipline the learning situation is hollow or even non- existent and the
products of such undisciplined situation are a threat to their home and
society. It was because of this that Obi (2004): stated “O ye who teach
the indigenous youth of the nations - I pray ye flog them upon all
occasions it mends their moral never mind the pain. It is only children
from cultured home that can be law abiding in the school.
When rules are made they are normally backed up with sanctions
for offenders and this is where punishments come to be used as
corrective measures. Ndu (1997) “cites section 9 (1) and (2) of the East
Central State of Nigeria Public Education Edict of 1974 which authorizes
the school to punish students under certain conditions”. For this purpose
although the problem of school violence and indiscipline have increased
tremendously in many schools of the society yet it could be controlled
by suitable administrative measures. Hence the need for principals who
are administrators to live up to expectation.
Ocho (1997) stressed that punishment is a widely applied method
of controlling behaviour in Nigerian and African communities. Parents
and teachers use punishment more often than any other method to
correct and control their children’s behaviour. Obi (2004) presents three
criteria upon which punishment should be assessed:- Retributive :
Kneel down; run; official dismissal; cancellation of examination results;
Isolation; flogging; Sit down on the floor; Repairs of property; stand up;
Report to the form master for late coming for the next one week and
suspension from school for persistent bullying.
Deterrent:
Scolding; Missing first lesson for late coming; Cutting of grasses;
Detention ; Picking refuse; washing school toilet; Warning; Changing a
student desk; Demotion; Ignoring; Withdrawal of classroom privileges;
bring parents to see the principal ; Imposition writing; Corporal
punishment; Sending a students to the principal and requiring the pupil
to re-do something correctly.
Reformative:
Suspension and expulsion; writing a letter of apology; self-management;
moral training; counseling of student; dismissed for 1 week in the term
for disobeying authority; name entered in log book; Not to be allowed to
participate in school activities; sweep the classroom; giving some
assignment to be shown to the form teacher and being sent out of the
class.
OLadele (1989) listed types of punishment to be given to students
while Obi (2004) states the criteria upon which the punishment should be
assessed. This enables the principals to use it to maintain discipline.
Champion (2005) stated that corporal punishment is among types
of punishment commonly used in schools. While Oladele (1989) listed
examples of punishing devices as follows: Scolding threats and
warning detention either before or after school sending a student to
principal isolation suspension flogging depriving the pupil of some
desirable privilege.
These are to be used by both principals and teachers in the
schools. The variables in this study are teachers and students which are
the dependent while the punishment is the independent variable. But
the ways they have had effect in maintaining discipline in schools are not
yet established. It is then necessary that the effect of punishment in
maintaining discipline is to be sought from the teachers and students
who are most often the recipients.
Statement of the Problem
The problem of lack of discipline as they affect secondary schools
is increasing everyday and is a cause of anxiety to most well-meaning
citizens of the country. The majority of disciplinary problems that might
confront school administrators originate in the home and the total school
environment and not just from the classroom instructional situation.
These disciplinary problems become very important when the variety of
situation from which they may spring is remembered.
There are more information from newspaper that authenticate this
issue of lack of discipline in the schools especially in the area of
examination malpractices. Adeyegba (1994) reported that a total of
151674 cases were recorded in SSCE throughout the country between
1991 and 1993.
Other problems include; bullying the younger ones vandalism
lateness truancy stealing fighting cultism loitering in the school
compound absenteeism deliberate breach of school rules and
regulations etc.
In order to address these problems among students school
principals engage themselves in different disciplinary measures like;
verbal reprimands withdrawal of privileges detention suspension
cutting of grasses while the classes are on sit down isolation
imposition writing flogging etc. Principals are doing the best they can
yet the act of lack of discipline is on the increase.
The chief administrator of the school and all the staff need to
scrutinize the administrative actions and procedures they adopt in
administering punishment. The problems therefore put in question form
is how do teachers and students perceive the effects of punishment in
maintaining discipline in schools.
Purpose of the Study
The main purpose of this study is to examine how teachers and students
perceive punishment as strategy for maintaining discipline in schools.
Specifically the study aims at determining the following:
1) how do teachers perceive the effect of retributive oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools.
2) how do students perceive the effect of retributive oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools.
3) how do teachers perceive the effect of deterrent oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools.
4) how do students perceive the effect of deterrent oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools.
5) how do teachers perceive the effect of reformative oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools.
6) how do students perceive the effect of reformative oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools.
Significance of the study
This work is significant in the sense that if the findings are applied the
principals guidance counselors the school Board and the society at
large stand to benefit.
The principals of schools when this work is published are left with
options in selecting a number of administrative procedures suitable as
deterrent punishment. The effective use of punishment by principals as
school administrators will enable them in restoring the hopes of the
affected students and making them law abiding in school.
Guidance counselors will find a combination of administrative
punishment measures complementary to their work and learn to work
more. Discipline problems are tackled administratively as well as by the
use of guidance counseling closely with the principals.
The State Education Commission may from the findings of this
work review their stand and policies on certain aspects of punishment in
schools.
Moreover it will be of immense operational importance to
practicing education administrators who may wish to set up their own
private institutions to achieve maximum administrative progress.
Finally the entire society will equally benefit from the study.
Whenever disciplined students are produced they will be more relevant
to their families to their employers to the government and entire society
will be free from societal ills/crimes.
Scope of the Study
The study was on the impact of punishment as perceived by
teachers and students in maintaining discipline in secondary schools in
Enugu Education Zone. The study was delimited to Enugu North Local
Government Area secondary schools in Enugu State. Although there are
four aspects of punishment namely: Retributive Deterrent Reformative
and Rehabilitative. The study was delimited to retributive deterrent and
reformative aspects of punishment that are commonly used in secondary
schools.
Research Questions
The following research questions guided the study:
1) How do teachers perceive the effects of retributive oriented
punishment in maintaining disciplining in schools?
2) How do students perceive the effect of retributive oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools?
3) How do teachers perceive the effect of deterrent oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools?
4) How do students perceive the effect of deterrent oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools?
5) How do teachers perceive the effect of reformative oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools?
6) How do students perceive the effect of reformative oriented
punishment in maintaining discipline in schools?
Hypotheses:
The following null hypotheses were stated and tested at 0.05 level of
significance:
1. There is no significant difference in the teachers and students
perceived effects of retributive oriented punishment in maintaining
discipline in schools.
2. There is no significant difference in the teachers and students
perceived effects of deterrent oriented punishment in maintaining
discipline in schools.
3. There is no significant difference in the teachers and students
perceived effects of reformative oriented punishment in
maintaining discipline in schools.
Project Information
Price
NGN 3,000Pages
109Chapters
1 - 5Program type
masters degree